The 4 for Forest Hills admit Culture of Kindness Resolution was an “unnecessary distraction” and a wasteful expense

After 18 months, the Forest Hills School District board finally rescinded the controversial Culture of Kindness Resolution. In a special meeting this morning at 7 am, a unanimous vote was heard by a number of district residents in attendance to settle the lawsuit and rescind the resolution. 
​
The Protect Diversity group has created a timeline of events to provide a retrospective look at the dates and documents that were publicly available surrounding this event for the background and accurate history, including the statement written in protest by the National Underground Freedom Center, here in Cincinnati. 

The district has issued a statement, now available on the Forest Hills School District Website, claiming that the “settlement is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing” and that the board “denies that the Resolution violates anyone’s legal rights.”

Interestingly, the board suggested that the decision to rescind and settle the lawsuit was due to the recognition that the document and actions to defend it were distracting from education of students. In their statement they write,  “the board chose to resolve the matter to avoid the unnecessary distraction from the important business of educating children and to also cease the costs of litigation that would burden taxpayers

The district has aggressively fought to defend the Resolution since the vote to pass it in 2022. Although many signals indicated that the effort was hurting the community, the board persisted despite 

• 3500+  community signatures on a petition asking to rescind, 
• Months of individuals including students and teachers speaking out against the resolution at public meetings (see example from Jan 2023)
• Levy committee’s concern on the additional burden & risk to passing school funding because of The controversial Resolution. (see speaker in May here on the impact on the levy votes, minute 35)
• Negative national press coverage of Sara Jonas’ statement in support
• Thousands of dollars in insurance expenses incurred that threaten district premiums

For 18 months, the supporting board members Bibb, Hausfeld, Jonas and Stewart willingly and knowingly engaged in - in their own words issued today - the “unnecessary distraction from the important business of educating children” and even as late as October 27th 2023 stated that they looked forward to defending the resolution in court. ​

This district has always deserved a board that considers students and staff first, perhaps the members of the board finally realized that the “business” of educating children should never include acts to discriminate, silence, or oppress cultural heritage, born-in traits, selected religious affiliation or even prevent healthy self reflection in class settings. 

Perhaps the 4 for Forest Hills finally acknowledged that the Resolution indicated a lack of basic understanding of the progress of society towards inclusion. Perhaps the 4 for Forest Hills learned over the last year and half that societies that demonstrate equity among diverse groups have higher economic stability than those that do not, as shown in this article by the International Monetary Fund, a global organization that works to achieve sustainable growth and prosperity and studies the impact of diversity and the acceptance of diversity on economies. 
​
Or, perhaps Board President Linda Hausfeld, member Bibb, member Jonas and member Stewart realized that the position was always a losing one. The combination of events that occurred from the end of October and early November demonstrated they were going to have little support from their voters and limited opportunity from a legal standing. 

The notable series of events in the last few weeks cemented the inevitable end 

• The judge found that the plaintiffs had standing to sue (10/26/23)
• Judge wrote the legal defense presented by legal defense and Sara Jonas “defies logic” (10/26/23)
• Subpoenas issued to a local resident / campaign supporter of “The 4 for Forest Hills” allegedly involved in drafting the Resolution, risking already limited community support
• Date for discovery materials to be delivered was established, risking public visibility to potentially unflattering communications between board members & authors
• Election outcome eliminated the potential 5-vote supermajority for The 4 for Forest Hills 

While we celebrate the outcome and speculate on the motivation, we must continue to be vigilant. The board members that remain may still make other attempts to enact the policy’s words through other existing policies and actions. Or, they may consider the chance to rely on state-level legislation currently being debated. As a community our voices tied with increased visibility to the board’s actions through public records and increased engagement at meetings, in PTO’s and PTA’s, in Booster Clubs has led us to a satisfying outcome today, but as always - we encourage the community to continue to work for a more inclusive tomorrow .